AI doesn't just get things wrong — it gets things wrong confidently
AI models hallucinate. Not occasionally — structurally. It's built into how they work: they generate the most probable next word, not the most accurate answer. This means every response carries a risk of confident, undetectable errors — fabricated sources, wrong numbers, plausible-sounding nonsense.
Anyone who uses AI seriously has hit this wall. You get an answer that looks right, sounds right, and turns out to be wrong — and there was no way to tell without checking it yourself.
We studied the research on cross-model verification and built a method that maximizes the chance of catching these errors automatically. Multiple models analyze the same question independently, then challenge each other's reasoning. It's not a vote — it's a stress test. The result is a trust score grounded in where models agree, where they disagree, and why.
QA engineer turned founder. 7+ years in software testing across banking, healthcare, fintech, and e-commerce — including 4.5 years at EPAM Systems testing enterprise platforms serving over a million users. Led QA teams, built test automation, and validated an AI financial assistant before realizing the same verification gap exists in every AI interaction. Created the verification method behind CrossCheck — bringing the rigor of enterprise QA to AI output reliability.
Product designer and entrepreneur with 10+ years of experience. From founding her own photo studio to leading design teams at SynthesTech Research Center and crafting visual strategy for iSpace (ASBIS Group), Diana brings a rare combination of creative leadership and business ownership. At Platilus, she owns the full marketing design stack — brand identity, UI/UX architecture, conversion optimization, and investor communications.
Free during beta. Bring your own API keys.
Get Early Access